上海新航道托福培訓小編特別整理了首場考試的詳情，這次給大家帶來了寫的關于2021年4月26日托福獨立寫作范文及解析。希望幫助考生對照文本更好的研究真題，充分備考，爭取理想成績，實現留學夢想。

  2021年4月26日托福獨立寫作

  【考場題目回憶】

  Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:

  Scientists should be responsible for the negative impacts of their discoveries.

  Use specific reasons and examples to support your position.

  【Introduction】

  Scientists, pioneers of human society, have been constantly exploring the unknown, unraveling the mysteries, and making breakthroughs. During this process, some unexpected troubles, however, are unfortunately inevitable. While scientists could alert people, they can hardly prevent those troubles. Besides, if scientists were held responsible for those negative impacts, they would be demotivated to innovate. Hence, we should not blame scientists for the undesirable results of scientific findings.

  【Body】

  For starters, scientists should not be scapegoats. In another word, 【強調句】it is the users, like politicians or businessmen, who should shoulder responsibility of the negative impacts of scientific findings. 【巧妙的類比也是論證方式之一】 Just like a knife could be used to cut bread or to murder someone, a scientific discovery can be used to benefit or hurt people. Take scientific findings in physics, namely weapons, as an example. While it could be used to deter criminals, it may also abused by criminals to kill innocent civilians, which is certainly contrary to scientists’ intention. In this case, the negative effect of such findings is not up to its finders, scientists, but to the users.

  【寫作思路】

  很簡單的邏輯：就像一把刀即可以拿來切菜也可以拿來謀殺一樣，科學研究也會因使用者“intentions” 的不同而產生不同的作用。

  那么很明顯，當持有 “bad intentions” 的 “壞蛋” 使用時這些研究造成傷害時，有“good intention”的科學家肯定不該負責。

  【Body】

  【虛擬語氣】Were the scientists asked to be accountable for all the possible negative outcomes of their discoveries, it would undoubtedly hinder the progress of science. To specify, the advent of any scientific findings cannot be divorced from bold attempts. If scientists are required to be responsible for negative impacts of their progressions, they may become overcautious or even scared to make progresses. Contrarily, scientists who are exempted from taking responsibility for the unexpected negative effect tend to be more motivated in discovering. Therefore, for the advent of new technologies, scientists should not be responsible for the negative impact.

  【寫作思路】

  科學研究肯定是通過不斷的大膽嘗試才能完成的，當科學家知道自己將來要為任何潛在的風險(這當然是很有可能發生的啦)負責時，他們會變的過于謹慎，從而很難創新。

  【Body】

  Admittedly, scientists should be aware of the potential hazards behind findings, and they are responsible for informing the users of those harms. However, negligence are not totally avoidable yet completely understandable. Not to mention, even if the users are crystal clear about those potential negative impacts, they may still make mistakes triggering those potential impacts, either because they are careless or too profit-driven. With the aforementioned points clarified, 【反問句也能強化語氣】how can we place blame on scientists?

  【寫作思路】

  科學家只有義務負責提醒大家潛在的風險，且不談他們也會疏忽。就算他們考慮到了方方面面，也阻止不了使用者在使用時造成疏忽。

  【Conclusion】

  In conclusion, 記得直接了當的回答題目(我不同意科學家應該為科研的消極影響負責)+概括如上三段分論點(偷懶快速的方式就是高度概括每段中心句)即可。